Contextual Research
when/what/how/who makes sex appropriate?
the essay uses a range of theoretical sources to come to conclusion that
Ads can use and do use sex and sexuality content widely throughout the industry, this is as this style of advertising sells via using the idea that desire is a major feature needed to persuade the audience. Also sexual imagery is used to grab an audience’s attention heavily thought the past and new advertising campaigns but the companies using these themes have to be aware of the relevance, audience and subject of the adverts as there is a thin line in the industry where the used of the imagery can receive negative impression (CK 1995) and even get the advert banned (American appeal adverts). This essay has concluded that if sex is used in adverting it can be a useful stagey to make the audience notice their products/companies but the advertiser need to make sure they stay away from any content that might have pedophilic implications or any adverts that use sexuality inappropriatly as any association with the adverts ethical stance can be applied to the company, target audience can be offended by advert and apply this negative idea to the brand itself.
The essay concludes that use of sex become offensive, negative or banned is when the content is not relevant, subject age and exploits the subject. But are they are other campaigns or reasons adverts would be sex as sexual unsuitable??
via http://www.campaignlive.com/article/does-sex-sell-2016/1408487
This articles suggest that the more gender fluid and sexually fluid younger consumer market effect the use of sex, using sexual imagery will only appeal to the selected sexual orientation in the new age, where more people are sexual unsure or experimenting this has effected the use of this imagery. Using gender sexual imagery is being used less by companies as it's narrowing their audience. Also the rise of feminism is causing more and views complaint against exploitation and degrading imagery . Sex need to be sold in a different way that exclude or annoy these audeince.
http://www.oddee.com/item_96502.aspx
why are sexual ads banned?
-objectifies women, objectified and demeaned women
-unsuitable in a location that could be seen by children
-sexual image was likely to cause serious or widespread offence
-the copulating toys were considered offensive and obscene, seen to advice sex to a younger audeince
-it was sexually explicit, context could be seen unsuitable for children in magazine location
http://www.businesspundit.com/10-ads-that-were-banned-for-sexual-content/
-seen as not relevant to the content
http://www.independent.co.uk/news/jack-wills-advertising-standards-authority-asa-fashion-teenager-ads-clothing-a7058951.html
-deemed inappropriate for young people.
- ASA ruled that younger teens might have a direct or indirect access to the catalogue and the images might appeal to younger readers because they portray “a lifestyle to which they might aspire”.
research feedback that the seuxal apporation defining factors-
-direct or indirect access to a underage audeince/location could be seen by children
-sexual objectification of the subject/exploitation
-subjects tone, the subject has to appear as in control/positively responding to the situation
-sexualizing underage content/subject, pedophilic implications
-sexual relation to content, relevance to the product
-sexualizing adolescence material
No comments:
Post a Comment